30 Bananas a Day!

I'd appreciate it if you kept things simple. If you don't feel as though things can be proved then I personally don't wish to hear about it.  You can mention it of course. I don't really think somethings can be proved 100% either but I think you can give somone enough information on something that they are able to decide whether or not to believe in and follow the approach. I kind of like to use a similiar approach to Colin Campbell. I look at the big picture. I observe what people eat and what effect that has on them. Unless you want to try all these diets for yourself then you kind of have to trust in other peoples experiences to some extent once you have confirmed that they followed all diets the way they were supposed to. The paleo people for example have found a diet better than their previous and conclude that it's the best diet without having tried others. This is not logical of course. I'm sure some of them have tried various diets including 811. Whether they did it right or not is another matter.

 

It seems that too many people like to think about isolated studes too much such as the effect of vitamin c on a human cell or something. This is basically what Cordain seems to do in the debate between him and Campbell on protein. If you are able to look at all the possible factors that could be involved then you could do it this way but I personally see it as a bit of a waste of time.

 

I'm mostly talking about how do you prove a diet here or what causes what in terms of health but whatever.

 

There's probably similiar threads out there but there's no harm in having another eh? :) Prove me wrong ;)

Views: 317

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I do it.

Excellent answer :). But it only proves it to yourself but I suppose you could tell others to do the same. What about proving that something like the diet your following will work in the long term? This is not quite as simple as there aren't many people that have been on 811 for over 10 years. Or diets such as paleo for that matter. I think then you have to bring some kind of isolated science into the picture. Quote studies etc. Then it's just a matter of proving that your study has been conducted better than the persons that you are debating with providing they have one. That the study has overlooked something or whatever

The better educated one is, the easier it is to debate. Ultimately though, there is not enough scientific evidence to convince everyone, and nutritional science in particular is so young and incomplete that it can be compared to surgery in the 17th century. Sure, we can cut you up, but would you want to lie on the table? 

 

But generally the better educated you are, the easier it is to take down arguments. And the better your health, the more convincing your arguments (though simply the fact of being very healthy is no proof of any diet, particularly if you are young and active). I personally seldom debate to convince anyone though, I usually debate in order learn myself.

Yeah

 

I like to put across information to people that would probably never consider it otherwise though, and they can do what they like with it. I'm not telling people what to do or anything. But to deny it on an illogical basis and/or imply that I (and others)shouldn't believe in this thing is something that bothers me. Not to the extent that I'm getting angry about it or anything but I'd rather people not be that way myself.

 

I guess a lot of people don't want to believe things, open their minds up to new ideas or try things so it is next to impossible to debate.

 

Now how do I convince someone that I'm more educated than them hmmmm :D joke

You're more educated by knowing more, simple. Better arguments, knowing more, seeing their fallacies and having few yourself. (Everybody tends to have a few fallacies at least.) You shouldn't need to convince anyone of being more educated; if you are more educated, know more and argument better, it shouldn't take any convincing. It should be obvious. Of course, some people feel inferior when confronted with superior knowledge and will retort to all kinds of irrational arguments. Sometimes pounding helps (repeating the same arguments over and over, and they become convinced after 50 times or so), sometimes just laughing it off is a better approach.

 

I guess a lot of people don't want to believe things, open their minds up to new ideas or try things so it is next to impossible to debate.

 

I find that it helps to understand which OS their mind is running. Deep down, people want the same things, but the clothes they put on vary. That is, the ways in which they are trying to meet their needs are different, but the needs are roughly the same. Some people respond well to aggressive tactics, others are more likely to become engaged by a more contemplative and compassionate approach. There's no one size fits all. You probably have an approach which sits the most naturally with you, and I think that honing that approach is the best you can do rather than trying to learn an approach that feels alien to you.

Well I don't want to get into a debate here because I have bigger fish to fry ;). Not saying I'm right or anything. Just I think some of the things you've said are oversimplified. "better arguments", "knowing more". People will have different opinions as to what is a good argument unless you mean a better constructed one. A better constructed argument doesn't necessarily make it more true though than someone elses that could be perfectly true yet badly said. Of course if they're contradicting themselves then I suppose so. Knowing more. A doctor knows more than I do about the workings of the body, an anthropologist knows more than I do about anthropology, a biochemist in chemistry, all subjects that would make someone seem better educated in an argument on health but that doesn't make their argument any more true than mine necessarily. Knowing more about the relevant subject sure pretty much but what people do and don't see as relevant is something often up for debate and peoples opinons of whether or not that more information you have is actually right is another thing that people will question. Not so simple. If people aren't intelligent enough to realize when people are more intelligent then you do need to convince them. Not that I want to try.

 

Yes people respond to different approaches and I think I'm perfectly capable of adapting my approaches should I feel the need imo. Working out which OS they're using however is sometimes a task that will take some time and effort. So you would have already showed other approaches to some extent before figuring that out. That's not to say you can't change your approach but in some cases yes. Yes people want the same things near enough. I think some people have an OS that doesn't easily take to updates possibly because they don't see the need for them sadly.

A key aspect here is that yes, there are practically infinite ways in attempt to prove something right in accordance to scientific conclusion, BUT proving something wrong is definitely much simpler to do. WHICH, leads to a wonderful quote I have ran into a long time ago;

 

"Science is always wrong. It never solves a problem without creating ten more"  George Bernard Shaw.

 

That's the beauty of it.. That is what drives science to such a staggering development over the years; almost even exponentially in growth. Does that make sense?

Hehe pretty much. Especially science that looks at things under the microscope compared to big picture observing.

 

Yes it is a lot easier to prove something is wrong in most cases

Some people like to read studies.  Some just like to see flab turned into FAB!

 

I went out training last night with the gun triathlete squad in my state. We did 8x1k repeats. I smashed all but one guy and on the last repeat he beat me by 8 seconds. I was wearing my 'go vegan' singlet and all 30 of us were on a 1k section of road so I got to pass everyone all the time and 'prove it'. ;)

 

RSS

About

TheBananaGirl created this Ning Network.

30BaD Search

Latest Activity

OrganicMark posted a status
"Trump supports mass sterilization of Americans through 5G #evolution #awakening #peace #truth #love #light #now http://bit.ly/2EoVgzr"
4 hours ago
OrganicMark posted a status
"HIGH TREE-ZIN! MCKABE, LISA PAYJE & SHIFTY ADAM COLLUDED WITH FOREIGN ASSETS IN THEIR COUP ATTEMPT! #truth #light#now http://bit.ly/2VaavBZ"
Tuesday
pradtf replied to pradtf's discussion great site with nutritional research information
Monday
OrganicMark posted a status
"Trump Declares National Emergency To Pay For Border Wall #evolution #awakening #peace #truth #love #light #now http://bit.ly/2Gu5rVt"
Feb 16
chris jones is now a member of 30 Bananas a Day!
Feb 16
Houdini Steve Owens joined M ♦'s group
Feb 13
Houdini Steve Owens left a comment for Hanyi Zhang
Feb 13
Profile IconHanyi Zhang and Maëwa joined 30 Bananas a Day!
Feb 13
pradtf replied to pradtf's discussion great site with nutritional research information
Feb 11
Reese posted a discussion
Feb 8
Olga posted a discussion
Feb 7
VeritasCurat is now a member of 30 Bananas a Day!
Feb 7
Peter Csere posted a video

Amazon Fruit Festival 2020

Be there or eat a pear! Ecuador. January 16-22, 2020. http://www.amazonfruitfestival.com AFF 2019 was a blast. Come to AFF 2020! Tickets on sale now, starting at $475 (prices go up April 1st.)
Feb 5
Manual Pedal posted a video

Surly Ogre Long Term Review

This is a review on my new #SurlyOgre after retiring my #SurlyLongHaulTrucker. I've had this bike for several months now. I updated it with all my parts from...
Feb 5
Profile IconHolly and Olga joined 30 Bananas a Day!
Feb 5
Charlotte Pickering replied to Peter Csere's discussion Terra Frutis in Ecuador is looking for members!
Feb 5

© 2019   Created by TheBananaGirl.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service